• The humidity vs. heat debate, and studying the lifetime impacts of famine

  • Aug 8 2024
  • Duração: 29 minutos
  • Podcast

The humidity vs. heat debate, and studying the lifetime impacts of famine

Ouça grátis

Ver detalhes do programa

  • Sumário

  • Researchers debate if humidity makes heat more deadly, and finding excess diabetes cases in Ukrainian people that were born right after the 1930s famine First up this week, which is worse: the heat or the humidity? Staff writer Meredith Wadman joins host Sarah Crespi to talk about conflicting reports on the risk of increased mortality when humidity compounds heat, and how to resolve the debate in the field. Next, LH Lumey, a professor of epidemiology at the Columbia University Medical Center, discusses what the catastrophe of a famine can teach us about the importance of maternal and fetal health for the long term. His work focuses on records of a 1930s Ukrainian famine painstakingly reconstructed by Ukrainian demographers after being obscured by the former Soviet Union. The famine records combined with newer data show that babies gestated during famine are more likely to acquire type 2 diabetes later in life. This week’s episode was produced with help from Podigy. About the Science Podcast Authors: Sarah Crespi, Meredith Wadman Episode page: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.z6yms94 About the Science Podcast: https://www.science.org/content/page/about-science-podcast Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
    Exibir mais Exibir menos
Política e Governo Ciências
Exibir mais Exibir menos
activate_samplebutton_t1

O que os ouvintes dizem sobre The humidity vs. heat debate, and studying the lifetime impacts of famine

Nota média dos ouvintes. Apenas ouvintes que tiverem escutado o título podem escrever avaliações.

Avaliações - Selecione as abas abaixo para mudar a fonte das avaliações.

Avaliações Audible.com.br

Avaliações na Amazon
Nenhuma revisão disponível